Poll

Should punishment commands (like jail and mute) continue to have effect when a client reconnects?

Yes
1 (100%)
No
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Voting closed: May 06, 2007, 01:43:40 PM

« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Should punishment commands continue when client reconnects?  (Read 2128 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Megiddo

  • Ulysses Team Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6214
  • Karma: 394
  • Project Lead
Should punishment commands continue when client reconnects?
« on: April 29, 2007, 01:43:40 PM »
When I recoded ULX for GM10, I left this out because it's fairly complicated for me to setup and I figured that anyone who abused this would be banned by the admin. However, I can see the usefulness in having this. What are your thoughts?
Logged
Experiencing God's grace one day at a time.

Offline JamminR

  • Ulysses Team Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8096
  • Karma: 390
  • Sertafide Ulysses Jenius
    • Team Ulysses [ULib/ULX, other fine releases]
Re: Should punishment commands continue when client reconnects?
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2007, 04:56:47 PM »
Personally, I like the continuation. Sometimes I'm not quite ready to ban someone, or, i'm being an evil admin and want the offender to be just as annoyed as I might have been by whatever they did. So, I toy with them first.

It doesn't have to be in the next release, but a future update would be nice.
Logged
"Though a program be but three lines long, someday it will have to be maintained." -- The Tao of Programming

Offline spbogie

  • Ulysses Team Member
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 456
  • Karma: 41
Re: Should punishment commands continue when client reconnects?
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2007, 07:27:13 PM »
Perhapse they should only carry over for limited time. Just to prevent them from using retry to escape it.
Logged
I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. - Thomas A. Edison
I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »