Author Topic: Should punishment commands continue when client reconnects? (Read 2181 times)

Megiddo · « **on:** April 29, 2007, 01:43:40 PM »

When I recoded ULX for GM10, I left this out because it's fairly complicated for me to setup and I figured that anyone who abused this would be banned by the admin. However, I can see the usefulness in having this. What are your thoughts?

JamminR · « **Reply #1 on:** April 29, 2007, 04:56:47 PM »

Personally, I like the continuation. Sometimes I'm not quite ready to ban someone, or, i'm being an evil admin and want the offender to be just as annoyed as I might have been by whatever they did. So, I toy with them first.

It doesn't have to be in the next release, but a future update would be nice.

spbogie · « **Reply #2 on:** April 29, 2007, 07:27:13 PM »

Perhapse they should only carry over for limited time. Just to prevent them from using retry to escape it.

Ulysses

Poll

Should punishment commands (like jail and mute) continue to have effect when a client reconnects?

Author Topic: Should punishment commands continue when client reconnects? (Read 2181 times)

Megiddo

Should punishment commands continue when client reconnects?

JamminR

Re: Should punishment commands continue when client reconnects?

spbogie

Re: Should punishment commands continue when client reconnects?